Release 2.4.64 #1964
Release 2.4.64 #1964
Conversation
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1964 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 16.05% 16.05%
Complexity 483 483
=========================================
Files 257 257
Lines 7824 7824
Branches 804 804
=========================================
Hits 1256 1256
Misses 6518 6518
Partials 50 50 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
WalkthroughThe pull request involves adding the Changes
Note: No sequence diagram is generated for this change as it is a simple test method annotation modification that does not involve complex interactions or control flow changes. ✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/test/java/selenium/analytics/VideoLearningEventsPageTest.java (1)
Line range hint
47-56: Consider improving test stability and isolation.The need to disable this test suggests potential architectural improvements:
- Consider separating the event simulator into a mock implementation for testing
- Add better error handling in the simulator to make tests more resilient
- Consider splitting unstable integration tests into a separate test suite that can be run independently
This would help prevent similar issues in the future and maintain better test coverage even when components have issues.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pom.xmlis excluded by!**/*.xml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/test/java/selenium/analytics/VideoLearningEventsPageTest.java(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, 21)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, 17)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, 21)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, 17)
- GitHub Check: test_ui_ENG
- GitHub Check: test_rest_ENG
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/test/java/selenium/analytics/VideoLearningEventsPageTest.java (1)
7-7: LGTM!The import statement for the
@Disabledannotation is correctly placed with other JUnit imports.
No description provided.